| Table of Contents |
|---|
Key Points
...
| Reference_description_with_linked_URLs_______________________ | Notes______________________________________________________________ |
|---|---|
| https://www.baimaas.com/ | |
Baimaas customer requirements for blockchain data marketplace
Dear Senthil
We are having a requirement in block chain ecosystem, you referred Paramount , below are the ask .
Capability
Scenario 1:
person who has ability to develop a block chain protocol based on set of use cases. this can be made thru forking out of existing protocol . for eg Ethereum blockchain or grounds up development of blockchain protocol based on given use cases (similar to ocean protocol)
Scenario 2:
Based on use cases , the lead architect /sme suggest leveraging existing protocols like Ethereum , hyperledger etc
The paramount offering and standard COE practice for any development engagement will include the standard operational structures, that we ( the client) will not be incurred charges for:
Environment
Paramount internal cloud/ blockchain development environment
Paramount internal cloud/ blockchain test environment
Paramount internal cloud/ blockchain staging environment
Paramount internal cloud/ blockchain pre-prod environment
Paramount internal cloud/ blockchain client demonstration production environment.
Testing Services :
Blockchain capable development houses have arrangements / frameworks in place for Ethereum fabric, some with Corda, some with XinFin, some with Polkadot and etc…. since they “favour” those specific blockchain protocols…and have their transaction fees models in place and not passed onto the client during the development phase…
For example, we do not want to pay for blockchain transaction/gas/ether/consensus/node/wallet/membership fees and etc fees, and have wait times and etc, as Paramount develop and deliver the platform/services/functions.
Paramount blockchain team/lead should understand this model quite well, so he/she would also be able to explain as well.
Expectation
We assume that Paramount has its own established blockchain/platform development ecosystem. Pls confirm?
Hope you have arrangements / frameworks in place for Ethereum fabric, some with Corda, some with XinFin, some with Polkadot and etc…. since they “favour” those specific blockchain protocols… Pls confirm?
As for one example….. if a development firm wants to partake in the Corda blockchain DLT network as a full member, it’ll cost approx. USD$250,000…depending upon their goals…
The assumption is that the developer teams already (or establishing) have the capabilities/tools/ frameworks in hand to deliver as part of the business offering.
we are expecting that the engaged development team will be able to provide a justified / quantifiable Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) operational model, at the time of hand-over/ transition. This will also determine the long-term operational costs in an outsourced engaged model.
Hope the above makes sense and is understandable.
Abdul Majeed
Baimaas data market protocol Task List
...
Application Feature Dependency Map
Application
...
Non-Functional Requirements
| Platform Capability__________________________________________ | Value_____________________________________________________________________ | |
|---|---|---|
| Identity Management | Trusted Profiles for people, organizations, devices | |
| Ownership & Consent Management | Every account can manage data and consent | |
| Application Management | Allows flexibility in licensing models given dependencies | |
| Compliance & Governance | Transparent, automated compliance & governance support | |
| Secure Data Sharing | Data shared securely based on authorizations | |
| Analytics & AI | Smart efficient decisions and optimizations | |
| Blockchain | Trusted Data Provenance ( secure CDE proofs ) | |
| Smart Data | Pre-built services, views | |
...
| _Item__________________ | notes______ |
|---|---|
| a>> well defined work packages for a product w good research tasks ** | |
| Which services do we integrate with vs build? | 3 B sourcing model |
Key Concepts
F2P Solution Concepts
F2P Modules
IAMS - Identity, Access and Memberships Services
SCMS - Supply Chain Management Services
FMS
...
COO - Certificate of Origin
BOE - Bill of Entry
BOL - Bill of Lading
Import documents
Export documents
RMA
Remittances
Remittance reconciliation: contract, order, receipt,
Invoicing
Invoice reconciliation: PO, BOL, packing list, vendor invoice, receipts, COO, BOE, inspections
Invoice payments
Direct payments on delivery
Contract payments
Invoice Loans - Factoring receivables
Crop Loans - highly risky
Payments - via payment services
Receivables
Purchasing
General Ledger
Resource Management ( Fixed Assets, Employees, Contractors, Providers )
Payroll
External integrations with SOR ( Systems of Record )
Analytics
Events
Dependencies
Subscriptions
Actions ( when )
Processes
Alerts
FMS dependencies ( define required, optional modules )
XAC - Cross Application Control
AMS - Account Management Services
- identity
- account relations: client, vendor, employee
- roles
- authorizations
- integrations to external IAMS
- contracts
- documents
- AML, KYC support
VMS - Vendor Management Services ???
- identity
- account relations: client, vendor, employee
- roles
- authorizations
- integrations to external IAMS
- contracts
Purchasing
Inventory
Quality
Shipment
Payments
General Ledger
FMS use of templates
transaction ledger formats
...
digital credentials
tokens
food supply chain logistics improvement
food safety
ethical sourcing
fresher food
F2P Incomm presentation deck
Deck for InComm - Sep 23 v2 .pptx
...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GS1
context - existing solution
use cases for scope
quality - efficiency
security - safety
consent mgt
transparency
trust - immutability - traceability
integrations
problem stmts
current system focus ( add roadmap )
from user journeys ( cpa, dmv, dbr, firms )
user full credential exposure for proof requests
user id, pwd risks, issues
state reduced fraud, disputes
...
impacts for use cases
food recall reduction w data quality, automation, immutability,
transparency
...
impacts
security
data protection
data privacy
easy secure access
consent mgt
reduced fraud, impersonation
...
no other slides show the sourcing or produce quality benefits
revenue slide could benefit from added text to clarify the model
...
appendices
related stds - ssi, did, toip, pki, ...
swt id bc pptx
Potential Value Opportunities
Food Supply Chain
Distribution models ??
free 30 day trials hosted
limited function, capacity open-source version
enterprise version
Potential Differentiators ??
pluggable interfaces for: identities, RBAC, data models, logic scripts, workflows, events
industry specific
pre-built integrations - EDI etc
partners on sub-systems - eg payments, inventory
Research list
Normal ERP logistics apps in cloud
Please review the shared links and let me know your thoughts.
Other Trade Finance solutions and use cases
...
Bills of Lading
Tokenizing Bills of Lading - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JN69tm9bq7c
Potential Challenges
Legal Terms and Documents
I have shared the legal artifacts on Blockchain and would appreciate your views.This will help our attorney draft the contents precisely matching our expectations.
My Onboarding support concepts
good customer service
easy, effective, low-cost Paramount support options
...
No-charge Account planning meetings to define
goals, expected usage, gather requirements, plan any custom services, standard onboarding, training, connections, support and more
...
use youtube videos, docs as an option here
...
use knowledge base with youtube video links as first stop for help normally
...
provide direct email, live chat and phone support options for registered account contacts
...
use custom Zoom support meetings as needed to resolve issues
...
use online Grails app to record and manage work requests ( problems, questions, feature requests )
...
...
customer portal provides account information and billing status
Customer responsibilities for implementation and support
Customer Resources committed to meet planned onboarding and support requirements
Customer designates specific support contacts who go through on-boarding training courses
Customer is responsible for integrations to existing systems unless Paramount hired on a custom SOW under an MDA to provide services integrations
Customer documents planned usage of services using JEPL ( Java Event Processing Language ) to define a planned usage model for workflows, event notifications, automation
Paramount provides support on usage documentation with JEPL via knowledge base and support staff
Customer provides a test environment to test and validate planned usage and identity support problems separate from Production systems
Customer uses Paramount online support templates to record any support incidents ( problems, questions, feature requests ) and submit to Paramount online ( see work request template as a Grails app )
Candidate Solutions
F2P solution
MVP Plan
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fmNi3Nptr335LZyp-40l8sM7kntZLzFh/view?usp=sharing
...
Problem Statements
https://paramountsoft.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/FAR/pages/264077353/Problem+Statements
Meetings
Restructure F2P product plan - 210504
Remaining sub topics within each module will be considered later as and when the scope arises.
...
Step-by-step guide for Example
...
sample code block
...
| language | text |
|---|---|
| title | sample code block |
| linenumbers | true |
| collapse | true |
Recommended Next Steps
Related articles
...
| hidden | true |
|---|
...