m Psoft F2P Pitch Deck
- jim mason
Key Points
- logistics and reverse logistics
- energy trading
- service work
- parts tracking
References
| Reference_description_with_linked_URLs_______________________ | Notes______________________________________________________________ |
|---|---|
| F2F Product document folder | |
| Deck for InComm - Sep 23 v2 .pptx | |
| Revisit F2P-jim.pptx | |
SCB - Consumers Want Transparency in Supply Chain - Saptarshi SCB - Consumers Want Transparency in Supply Chain - Saptarshi pdf | |
Investor Pitch Deck Concepts
Pitch Deck Goals
- fit to the investor profile
- convince this is the right team to be successful
- convince me there is a market and value not addressed with existing solutions
- convince this is the time and strategy that can pay off
- identify clearly the investments ( and efficiency, effectiveness ) planned, made to date on a timeline
- show me how the business and operations, delivery and technical risks are clear, manageable and minimized for investors
- show me the proposed investment model, expected returns on a timeline, delivery targets and control actions for missed targets
- show me sample shares models and standard return metrics for selected time ranges with exit strategies for the investor
- show me the transparency, governance models and reporting I can expect managing the investment
- answer questions
- close with VCRS summary - Value > Costs > What it Takes to Do it Right > Success Keys for Execution
Pitch Deck Content Items
- Executive summary - elevator pitch on VCRS and returns
- Agenda
- Paramount not a startup, experienced
- summarize the "landscape" - who are the impact groups, actors, roles, scale & durability
- F2P solution process ( show customer, channel engagement )
- F2P market needs, opportunities ( research, stats, cases, quotes, currency, any original research to validate findings ) and value
- Existing solution gaps ( reference competitive solutions to show gaps as needed ) and summarize with F2P SWOT wins
- F2P solution process
- end with VCRS summary - Value > Costs > What it Takes to Do it Right > Success Keys
F2F Solution Concepts
F2P Potential Impacts
food supply chain logistics improvement
food safety
ethical sourcing
fresher food
targeted food recalls
simpler network growth
keys??? = vcrs
our opp>> simpler, lower cost payments
tokens = nft, rtok, ptok, gtok
integrated bank payments w wise xfer
universal wallet from erc1155
our opp>> automated invoice management
invoicing
automation via iot for billing life cycle
our opp>> natural growth the network
simplify the existing natural process to grow relationships
add incentives
free use for a period
rtokens for platform value generated, spent
our opp>>
build relations w thought leadership in foodchain on topics
F2F Incomm presentation deck
Deck for InComm - Sep 23 v2 .pptx
see the ps deck model ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GS1
context - existing solution
use cases for scope
quality - efficiency
security - safety
consent mgt
transparency
trust - immutability - traceability
integrations
problem statements
current system focus ( add roadmap )
from user journeys ( cpa, dmv, dbr, firms )
user full credential exposure for proof requests
user id, pwd risks, issues
state reduced fraud, disputes
new system
impacts for use cases
food recall reduction w data quality, automation, immutability,
transparency
strategy
add did, credentials for ssi, pii
impacts
security
data protection
data privacy
easy secure access
consent mgt
reduced fraud, impersonation
any specific kpis / metrics to measure impacts?
any other related references on benefits ?
how decentralized a network is this?
next to last slide ( F2P ) shows
safety benefit ( food recall )
no other slides show the sourcing or produce quality benefits
revenue slide could benefit from added text to clarify the model
recommendations
strategies
implementations
decisions
next steps
appendices
related stds - ssi, did, toip, pki, ...
swt id bc pptx
Marketing - Defining, Telling the Story in 3 parts
marketing - 3 stories to tell
1> what's the opp?
2> what can f2p do?
3> how did customers benefit to f2p?
Potential Value Opportunities
Freight Logistics using Broker Networks
LaneAxis
direct client to trucker scheduling without freight brokers
LaneAxis strives for a more efficient and transparent supply chain by exposing one of the industry’s biggest problems: the near-monopoly third-party brokers hold over the industry. The freight brokerage industry sells itself as a necessary component to smoothen out the supply chain. But logic dictates that brokers need a chaotic and fractured supply chain to justify their existence. Without chaos they would be rendered obsolete. LaneAxis rejects this business model. We strive for efficiency.
The global pandemic made it utterly clear that the supply chain isn’t ready for the demanding online environment. With the increasing demand, the expectations of end consumers also rose, demanding fast delivery without wanting to risk any loss of quality. Images of store shelves stripped bare of essentials such as toilet paper and cleaning supplies belied the fact that many of those products were in fact available and sitting in warehouses. But as the world saw, chaos consumed the supply chain. A direct, transparent freight network utilizing blockchain could have significantly mitigated this supply chain crisis by identifying available supply with available nearby carrier capacity.
Problems with Brokers for Shippers
Broker Cost vs Efficiency
One of the many examples that illustrates the broken, unfair and outdated broker machine encompasses the fact that brokers routinely consume 40-70% commissions on freight movements, with those margins essentially pulled from the pockets of hard-working drivers. Even worse, freight brokerages – which are largely unregulated - are not required to reveal how much a shipper has paid them to haul a load. So carriers are kept in the financial dark. Apart from the fact that the broker machine is often hustling shippers, carriers and drivers out of money - their systems lack efficiency. Common problems are the lack of visibility into real-time capacity, the lack of direct connectivity, unforeseen detention times, empty truck miles, and many more, resulting in inefficient and skewed supply chain metrics.
Shipping Challenges in Supply Chain ( 2021 - LaneAxis )
LaneAxis = Blockchain + AI to solve shipping problems
LaneAxis’ focus is on the persistent two-pronged problem, namely
1) connecting shippers directly to carriers and
2) managing the complicated process of a freight movement from A to Z - from contracts to insurance certificates to shipment documents - all the way to the final proof of delivery.
Thus, providing an all-in-one system that eliminates brokers, enables shippers to find and connect to qualified carriers directly, and crucially manages and monitors all aspects of the freight movement right down to the consumer.
Explainer video for blockchain shipping network vs current broker solution
Food Supply Chain
Distribution models ??
free 30 day trials hosted
limited function, capacity open-source version
enterprise version
Potential Differentiators ??
pluggable interfaces for: identities, RBAC, data models, logic scripts, workflows, events
industry specific
pre-built integrations - EDI etc
partners on sub-systems - eg payments, inventory
Research list
Normal ERP logistics apps in cloud
Please review the shared links and let me know your thoughts.
Potential Challenges
Legal Terms and Documents
I have shared the legal artifacts on Blockchain and would appreciate your views.This will help our attorney draft the contents precisely matching our expectations.
My Onboarding support concepts
good customer service
easy, effective, low-cost Paramount support options
No-charge Account planning meetings to define
goals, expected usage, gather requirements, plan any custom services, standard onboarding, training, connections, support and more
use youtube videos, docs as an option here
use knowledge base with youtube video links as first stop for help normally
provide direct email, live chat and phone support options for registered account contacts
use custom Zoom support meetings as needed to resolve issues
use online Grails app to record and manage work requests ( problems, questions, feature requests )
use online BIRT or equivalent Web report tool to show system usage and manage work request status
customer portal provides account information and billing status
Customer responsibilities for implementation and support
Customer Resources committed to meet planned onboarding and support requirements
Customer designates specific support contacts who go through on-boarding training courses
Customer is responsible for integrations to existing systems unless Paramount hired on a custom SOW under an MDA to provide services integrations
Customer documents planned usage of services using JEPL ( Java Event Processing Language ) to define a planned usage model for workflows, event notifications, automation
Paramount provides support on usage documentation with JEPL via knowledge base and support staff
Customer provides a test environment to test and validate planned usage and identity support problems separate from Production systems
Customer uses Paramount online support templates to record any support incidents ( problems, questions, feature requests ) and submit to Paramount online ( see work request template as a Grails app )
Candidate Solutions
Farm to Fork - F2F solution
MVP Plan
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fmNi3Nptr335LZyp-40l8sM7kntZLzFh/view?usp=sharing
OKR - Objectives Key Results
Problem Statements
https://paramountsoft.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/FAR/pages/264077353/Problem+Statements
Step-by-step guide for Example
sample code block