/
INATBA - EU Blockchain group

INATBA - EU Blockchain group

Key Points


References

Reference_description_with_linked_URLs_______________________Notes______________________________________________________________


https://inatba.org/
https://inatba.org/index.php/working-groups/
EBSI Home
LACCHAIN Home


INATBA Topics


Letter on DLT in EIDAS 2 requirements - 2023
Letter on Tech Neurtrality in EU Data Act - 2023


INATBA blockchain week 2024 - Oct 8 - 10


INATBA PORTAL login INTABA PORTAL
instaba-finance-wg-minutes-folder Finance WG

Identity WG

AI WG



Key Concepts




Potential Value Opportunities



blockchain-report-dlt-Convergence of AI and Blockchain-inatba-2024.pdf  file



INATBA Session to Public Sector and other Hyperledger groups 

Friday, May 17, 2024.   10 am ET

Morgane Stein 

Industry Partnerships, Events & Membership Recruitment Manager @INATBA


Session topics

INATBA Overview - Mission, Focus, Goals, Organization, Membership

Current Projects and Work Summary

INATBA Opportunities & Road Forward

Questions


INATBA - Finance WG



  • new Role as MICA implementation watchdog 
  • model for ReFi solution architecture concepts >> 
  • leverage benefits of DeFi >> decentralization, tokenization, market efficiency potential
  • add the capabilities and requirements CeFi meets 
  • accept requirement that all transactions can be: ACID, trustless, compliant, riskless, resilient, private, confidential, secure, complex
  • accept requirement that compliance includes validation of parties, transactions, assets while meeting privacy, confidentiality regulations
  • accept that party and transaction compliance at least covers multi-jurisdictions, KYC / KYB, AML, sanctions enforcement
  • to meet these requirements, transactions need a different life cycle and implementation architecture


i>> Create a detailed report evaluating the gaps and strategies to address them in Traditional ( Classic ) Financial systems. Address these items in the report: ( dependencies and trusts ), risks, efficiencies, trusts, multi-jurisdiction regulatory compliance, resiliency, recoverability, privacy, confidentiality, security, marketplace oversight, KYC, AML, sanctions enforcement )

i>> Create a detailed report evaluating the gaps and strategies to address them in DeFi Financial systems ( address the actual DeFi intermediaries ( dependencies and trusts ), risks, efficiencies, trusts, multi-jurisdiction regulatory compliance, resiliency, recoverability, privacy, confidentiality, security, marketplace oversight, KYC, AML, sanctions enforcement )

i>> Create a detailed report comparing the value, efficiency, capability, reliability, compliance, trust models for complex financial transactions using the UTXO vs the account model for the transaction solution architecture. Provide a summary table for the pros and cons comparing the UTXO to the account model for transaction integrity, efficiency, privacy, security, escrow support. Identify best open platforms to implement a decentralized financial system for each model.

i>> Create a detailed report to identify strategies to improve security, privacy, confidentiality, compliance reliability, availabilty, serviceability, resliiency and recoverability of financial system infrastructures, solutions, data and transactions

i>> Create a detailed report that defines how a decentralized ODS architecture ( Operational Data Stores ) can support ACID transactions with a life cycle that adds both commit and finality as 2 separate stages?

i>> create a detailed evaluation report comparing at least 6 "best" open decentralized ODS solutions ( Operational Data Stores ) for financial transactions to support ACID transactions with a life cycle that adds both commit and finality as 2 separate stages. Include Hyperledger Firefly as one of the 6 options to evaluate. define current open standards that apply to financial transactions and related ODS models.  For each ODS solution option, define current open standards supported, current level of adoption ( with statistics available ), pros and cons, linked references to architecture and API documentation. Create a summary table comparing the ODS solutions on: security, privacy, confidentiality, compliance reliability, availabilty, serviceability, resliiency and recoverability of financial system infrastructures, solutions, data and transactions. Recommend the best one and the rationale behind the recommendation.


INATBA Identity Management WG


https://o.inatba.org/identity-working-group/


Monthly Webcasts on Identity topics 


m250114  inatba id wg 
setup did podcast 
model, cadence, prep, do, post to youtube kbase
list - business ( vc xuc ), stds, tech, trends, usage, surveys
eidas 2.0
national sandboxes
americas
global 
Fabio has a good model for podcase prep on DID IN LATAM here
Government, Politics, and Decentralized Digital Identity
good article on ssi political impacts 
Political Implications of Self-Sovereign Digital Identity
eidas 2.0 panel coming feb 25
spherion sandboxes now
non eu did podcast
jim tg, ri lessons learned, ca mdl, hlf did wg, stds 
fabio budris klaz 
did argentina, mexico on cardano
ri pilot moved forward
ca hackathon 



INATBA AI WG




Potential Challenges



Candidate Solutions



Step-by-step guide for Example



sample code block

sample code block
 



Recommended Next Steps



Related content