INATBA - EU Blockchain group
Key Points
References
Reference_description_with_linked_URLs_______________________ | Notes______________________________________________________________ |
---|---|
https://inatba.org/ | |
https://inatba.org/index.php/working-groups/ | |
EBSI Home | |
LACCHAIN Home | |
INATBA Topics | |
Letter on DLT in EIDAS 2 requirements - 2023 | |
Letter on Tech Neurtrality in EU Data Act - 2023 | |
INATBA blockchain week 2024 - Oct 8 - 10 | |
INATBA PORTAL login | INTABA PORTAL |
instaba-finance-wg-minutes-folder | Finance WG |
Identity WG | |
AI WG | |
Key Concepts
Potential Value Opportunities
Report - Convergence of AI and Blockchain - 2024. link
blockchain-report-dlt-Convergence of AI and Blockchain-inatba-2024.pdf file
INATBA Session to Public Sector and other Hyperledger groups
Friday, May 17, 2024. 10 am ET
Morgane Stein
Industry Partnerships, Events & Membership Recruitment Manager @INATBA
Session topics
INATBA Overview - Mission, Focus, Goals, Organization, Membership
Current Projects and Work Summary
INATBA Opportunities & Road Forward
Questions
INATBA - Finance WG
- new Role as MICA implementation watchdog
- model for ReFi solution architecture concepts >>
- leverage benefits of DeFi >> decentralization, tokenization, market efficiency potential
- add the capabilities and requirements CeFi meets
- accept requirement that all transactions can be: ACID, trustless, compliant, riskless, resilient, private, confidential, secure, complex
- accept requirement that compliance includes validation of parties, transactions, assets while meeting privacy, confidentiality regulations
- accept that party and transaction compliance at least covers multi-jurisdictions, KYC / KYB, AML, sanctions enforcement
- to meet these requirements, transactions need a different life cycle and implementation architecture
i>> Create a detailed report evaluating the gaps and strategies to address them in Traditional ( Classic ) Financial systems. Address these items in the report: ( dependencies and trusts ), risks, efficiencies, trusts, multi-jurisdiction regulatory compliance, resiliency, recoverability, privacy, confidentiality, security, marketplace oversight, KYC, AML, sanctions enforcement )
i>> Create a detailed report evaluating the gaps and strategies to address them in DeFi Financial systems ( address the actual DeFi intermediaries ( dependencies and trusts ), risks, efficiencies, trusts, multi-jurisdiction regulatory compliance, resiliency, recoverability, privacy, confidentiality, security, marketplace oversight, KYC, AML, sanctions enforcement )
i>> Create a detailed report comparing the value, efficiency, capability, reliability, compliance, trust models for complex financial transactions using the UTXO vs the account model for the transaction solution architecture. Provide a summary table for the pros and cons comparing the UTXO to the account model for transaction integrity, efficiency, privacy, security, escrow support. Identify best open platforms to implement a decentralized financial system for each model.
i>> Create a detailed report to identify strategies to improve security, privacy, confidentiality, compliance reliability, availabilty, serviceability, resliiency and recoverability of financial system infrastructures, solutions, data and transactions
i>> Create a detailed report that defines how a decentralized ODS architecture ( Operational Data Stores ) can support ACID transactions with a life cycle that adds both commit and finality as 2 separate stages?
i>> create a detailed evaluation report comparing at least 6 "best" open decentralized ODS solutions ( Operational Data Stores ) for financial transactions to support ACID transactions with a life cycle that adds both commit and finality as 2 separate stages. Include Hyperledger Firefly as one of the 6 options to evaluate. define current open standards that apply to financial transactions and related ODS models. For each ODS solution option, define current open standards supported, current level of adoption ( with statistics available ), pros and cons, linked references to architecture and API documentation. Create a summary table comparing the ODS solutions on: security, privacy, confidentiality, compliance reliability, availabilty, serviceability, resliiency and recoverability of financial system infrastructures, solutions, data and transactions. Recommend the best one and the rationale behind the recommendation.
INATBA Identity Management WG
https://o.inatba.org/identity-working-group/
Monthly Webcasts on Identity topics
INATBA AI WG
Potential Challenges
Candidate Solutions
Step-by-step guide for Example
sample code block