Key Points

References

Reference_description_with_linked_URLs_______________________	Notes______________________________________________________________

https://inatba.org/
https://inatba.org/index.php/working-groups/
EBSI Home
LACCHAIN Home

INATBA Topics
Letter on DLT in EIDAS 2 requirements - 2023
Letter on Tech Neurtrality in EU Data Act - 2023

INATBA blockchain week 2024 - Oct 8 - 10

INATBA PORTAL login	INTABA PORTAL
instaba-finance-wg-minutes-folder	Finance WG
	Identity WG
	AI WG

Key Concepts

Potential Value Opportunities

Report - Convergence of AI and Blockchain - 2024. link

blockchain-report-dlt-Convergence of AI and Blockchain-inatba-2024.pdf file

INATBA Session to Public Sector and other Hyperledger groups

Friday, May 17, 2024. 10 am ET

Morgane Stein

Industry Partnerships, Events & Membership Recruitment Manager @INATBA

Session topics

INATBA Overview - Mission, Focus, Goals, Organization, Membership

Current Projects and Work Summary

INATBA Opportunities & Road Forward

Questions

INATBA - Finance WG

new Role as MICA implementation watchdog
model for ReFi solution architecture concepts >>
leverage benefits of DeFi >> decentralization, tokenization, market efficiency potential
add the capabilities and requirements CeFi meets
accept requirement that all transactions can be: ACID, trustless, compliant, riskless, resilient, private, confidential, secure, complex
accept requirement that compliance includes validation of parties, transactions, assets while meeting privacy, confidentiality regulations
accept that party and transaction compliance at least covers multi-jurisdictions, KYC / KYB, AML, sanctions enforcement
to meet these requirements, transactions need a different life cycle and implementation architecture

i>> Create a detailed report evaluating the gaps and strategies to address them in Traditional ( Classic ) Financial systems. Address these items in the report: ( dependencies and trusts ), risks, efficiencies, trusts, multi-jurisdiction regulatory compliance, resiliency, recoverability, privacy, confidentiality, security, marketplace oversight, KYC, AML, sanctions enforcement )

i>> Create a detailed report evaluating the gaps and strategies to address them in DeFi Financial systems ( address the actual DeFi intermediaries ( dependencies and trusts ), risks, efficiencies, trusts, multi-jurisdiction regulatory compliance, resiliency, recoverability, privacy, confidentiality, security, marketplace oversight, KYC, AML, sanctions enforcement )

i>> Create a detailed report comparing the value, efficiency, capability, reliability, compliance, trust models for complex financial transactions using the UTXO vs the account model for the transaction solution architecture. Provide a summary table for the pros and cons comparing the UTXO to the account model for transaction integrity, efficiency, privacy, security, escrow support. Identify best open platforms to implement a decentralized financial system for each model.

i>> Create a detailed report to identify strategies to improve security, privacy, confidentiality, compliance reliability, availabilty, serviceability, resliiency and recoverability of financial system infrastructures, solutions, data and transactions

i>> Create a detailed report that defines how a decentralized ODS architecture ( Operational Data Stores ) can support ACID transactions with a life cycle that adds both commit and finality as 2 separate stages?

i>> create a detailed evaluation report comparing at least 6 "best" open decentralized ODS solutions ( Operational Data Stores ) for financial transactions to support ACID transactions with a life cycle that adds both commit and finality as 2 separate stages. Include Hyperledger Firefly as one of the 6 options to evaluate. define current open standards that apply to financial transactions and related ODS models. For each ODS solution option, define current open standards supported, current level of adoption ( with statistics available ), pros and cons, linked references to architecture and API documentation. Create a summary table comparing the ODS solutions on: security, privacy, confidentiality, compliance reliability, availabilty, serviceability, resliiency and recoverability of financial system infrastructures, solutions, data and transactions. Recommend the best one and the rationale behind the recommendation.

INATBA Identity Management WG

https://o.inatba.org/identity-working-group/

Monthly Webcasts on Identity topics

m250114 inatba id wg

setup did podcast

model, cadence, prep, do, post to youtube kbase

list - business ( vc xuc ), stds, tech, trends, usage, surveys

eidas 2.0

national sandboxes

americas

global

Fabio has a good model for podcase prep on DID IN LATAM here

https://cardano.ideascale.com/c/cardano/idea/131515

Government, Politics, and Decentralized Digital Identity

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/government-politics-decentralized-digital-identity-new-budris-klaz-xtbwf/

good article on ssi political impacts

Political Implications of Self-Sovereign Digital Identity

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/political-implications-self-sovereign-digital-socio-fabio-budris-klaz/?trackingId=j88U39fJREmUDxFj2Oi4uA%3D%3D

eidas 2.0 panel coming feb 25

spherion sandboxes now

non eu did podcast

jim tg, ri lessons learned, ca mdl, hlf did wg, stds

fabio budris klaz

did argentina, mexico on cardano

https://www.linkedin.com/in/fabiobudris/

https://cardano.ideascale.com/c/cardano/idea/131515

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/fabiobudris_ecommerce-day-argentina-2024-muchisima-gente-activity-7235312787776802816-Ivua/?originalSubdomain=es

ri pilot moved forward

ca hackathon

INATBA Podcast on EIDAS 2.0 review of Digital Identity - panel

INATBA EDIAS 2 identity podcast 250325

From:
jemason1@yahoo.com
To:
Bara Greplova
Cc:
Cyntia Sarmanyova
,
Jim Mason

Fri, Feb 21 at 9:32 AM

Hi Bara

Yes. Thank you for the opportunity to participate in the INATBA identity podcast covering the EIDAS 2.0 review on March 25th, 16:00 CET ( 11:00 am EST ).

While I am a US based Solution Architect working at TrustGrid we architect digital identity solutions for many countries.
Most countries do look at EU regulations and standards as a leader for guidance on many technologies including digital identity.

In addition, I have worked since 2020 on US digital identity regulations at the State and Federal level tracking progress as the Public Sector Group leader at Hyperledger ( now LFDT ). I was the project leader for State of Rhode Island implementing the first US based SSI digital identity solution as an MVP in 2020 working with the Secretary of Commerce, Liz Tanner.

Let me know what you need.

Thank you,

Jim

On Friday, February 21, 2025 at 05:44:27 AM EST, Bara Greplova <bara.greplova@inatba.org> wrote:

Dear Jim,

I hope this finds you well.

I am reaching out since you expressed your interest to speak at one of the Identity podcasts we are planning in the coming months.

Would you be open to speak at the one on the 25th of March between 16-17 CET (11am New York time)? The topic would focus on eIDAS 2.0 in Review. The fact that this would focus on eIDAS 2.0 doesn't mean we cannot include a different/more global angle in the discussion. If you agree on the participation, I will send a joint email to the other speaker (Steffen Schwalm) and the moderators and we can discuss the content of that podcast together.

Thank you for letting me know about your availability.

With best wishes,

Bara

INATBA AI WG

Potential Challenges

Candidate Solutions

Step-by-step guide for Example

sample code block

sample code block

Recommended Next Steps

Related articles

Browser not supported